Why Most RAG Demos Fail in Production
Building a RAG demo is easy. Getting it to actually work in production — reliably, at scale, with real enterprise data — is where most teams struggle.
I've shipped several RAG systems now, from internal research tools to client-facing AI assistants. Here's what I've learned.
The Chunking Problem
Most tutorials chunk documents at fixed sizes (512 tokens, 1024 tokens) with fixed overlap. This is fine for demos. In production, it creates terrible retrieval because:
What actually works: Semantic chunking using embedding similarity to find natural break points, combined with parent-child chunking where you store small chunks but retrieve with larger context windows.
Retrieval Quality is Everything
Your embedding model matters less than you think. Your retrieval strategy matters a lot.
Naive vector search misses:
What actually works: Hybrid search (vector + BM25) with re-ranking using a cross-encoder model. Add a query expansion step using an LLM to generate alternative phrasings.
Evaluation is Non-Negotiable
You cannot improve what you don't measure. Set up evaluation from day one.
Key metrics:
Tools: RAGAS, DeepEval, or roll your own with GPT-4 as a judge.
Production Checklist
The difference between a demo and a production system is mostly operational maturity, not algorithmic cleverness.